Friday, July 1, 2016

US Flag and Church: A Dangerous Combination

I have posted this on the Episcopal web site Sermonsthatwork.com and on Facebook. Now I am posting it here. I wrote this in response to an insert that will go into many bulletins on July 3, 2016. A copy of the insert can be seen by going to the address above.

I am disappointed as a Christian and especially as an Episcopalian to see a bulletin insert featuring the US flag. It is inappropriate because it conflates Christianity with patriotism; a dangerous concept. This conflation has allowed this country to justify war and violence against other countries throughout much, if not all, of our history. This tendency has been extensively documented in a tome of a book, Sword Of The Spirit Shield Of Faith: Religion In American War And Diplomacy by Andrew Preston who teaches American history and international relations history at Cambridge University. In his preface to the book the author says, "Through the summer and fall of 2002 and into the new year, the Bush administration and its supporters made several arguments for war, from national security to democracy promotion and much else in between.
    Including faith. ... Bush consistently framed the crisis in terms of religion. ... But according to news reports ... the president believed he was spiritually motivated by an obligation to God and that God directed his actions and protected America in its time of crisis." Unfortunately this is the most recent reflective action of this type in time of war.
     What are we as Christians, to think about this. John Dominick Crossan addresses this question in his book God & Empire. He quotes Jesus from the Gospel of John where Jesus says, "My Kingdom is not of this world..." Crossed makes five points in the preface to the book in the exchange between Pilate and Jesus. "First Jesus opposes the Kingdom of God to the kingdoms of this world." In point three the author says in part, "Your Roman Empire Pilat, is based on the injustice of violence, but my divine kingdom is based on the justice of nonviolence." In the last paragraph of his preface Crossan says, "... I raise three questions in this book for ... Christian Americans. Since the Old Roman Empire crucified our Lord Jesus Christ how can we be his faithful followers in America as the New Roman Empire? ... a second question ... Is our Christian Bible ... actually for or against Jesus' nonviolent resistance to 'this world'? ... Is Bible-fed Christian violence supporting or even instigating our imperial violence as the New Roman Empire?"          Crossing makes the point in his book that the old model of Empire conquered other lands and occupied them for the purpose of extracting money and goods for them to sustain their luxurious Roman lifestyle. The US does not generally occupy other countries (although we have in the past) but we also extract wealth from other lands as an economic empire to sustain our luxurious lifestyles. The US is 5% of the total world population but uses vastly more of the world's resources.

     I say all of this to indicate that when we walk through the door (a red one for many of us) of our churches we are walking out of the Kingdom of this World into God's Kingdom where attitudes and ideas about power and violence are or should be turned on their heads. It is a place where the last are first, where we are told to turn the other cheek and to pray for our enemies. This is far different than the Kingdom of the World where might makes right and military power is used to dominate; where the strong get the most and the weak and powerless receive little, usually the "crumbs under the table". All this says to me that a US flag in a church bulletin insert is completely inappropriate.      

Wednesday, June 29, 2016

The conversion of Donald Trump and the problem with evangelicalism’s gospel

The conversion of Donald Trump and the problem with evangelicalism’s gospel



From the attached article by the Ministry Matters blog:

 "It is time we who claim to be followers of Jesus actually start living and proclaiming what Jesus actually said." (Emphasis mine.)

The blog post also confronts the "Easy Christianity" often promoted by the very conservative Evangelical movement, and confronts it for what it is.



The complete article can be read by going to the link above or by reading it here:


What does it say about evangelicalism in America that James Dobson, one of our leading voices for the last three decades, can claim that Donald Trump has accepted Jesus Christ as his personal Lord and Savior yet not a single one of Trump’s political policies or tactics has changed or been significantly modified by the lordship of Jesus? What does it say about us that the same man who, months ago, expressed no need for repentance before God, has now been declared a member of the Christian community without expressing that most foundational Christian disposition? Of course, Dobson excuses Trump’s lack of change with such lines as “he just doesn’t know our language” or claims that Trump’s “baby Christian” status excuses his plentiful references to “religion” without explicit statements of “faith and belief.” But I think these things are less the failure of Trump’s Christian infancy as much as they are a microcosm of the underlying problem with much of America’s evangelical movement — we actually have no idea what it means to be Christian. We lack a meaningful understanding of faith and belief.
Trump’s conversion experience, lacking as it is in fruits of repentance, godly sorrow, and changed life, isn’t primarily a reflection of what’s wrong with his soul (though it is that, too); it’s a reflection of what’s wrong with the soul of evangelicalism. Our reductions of Christianity show a general lack of understanding of what it means to say “Christ is Lord.” The biblical authors didn’t tell people, “You need at accept Jesus as your personal Lord and Savior,” as if accepting Jesus is the primary thing that happens in salvation. No, for the biblical writers, the gospel proclamation is, “Repent and believe; repent and be baptized for the forgiveness of sins.” Not only is this imperative not about intellectual assent to bullet points of doctrine, not only is this imperative not about my acceptance of Christ, but it is also not primarily about what I have done at all. It’s about the grand story of God, in Christ, healing a broken world and bringing about a new creation starting now.
Instead of this understanding of faith and belief, on national level we have reduced Christianity to a partisan political agenda, an entrenched representative of the culture wars, and a cognitive ideology to which one must claim assent in order to hold political power in America. On a local and individual level, we have reduced our faith to intellectually assenting to propositional truths (1. You are a sinner, 2. Jesus died for you. 3. You can go to heaven when you die), a cultural identifier (particularly in the South), and a religion of therapy, self-help and moralism.
Thus, the question is not whether Donald Trump has prayed some prayer. The question is not whether he has even made a verbal confession of Christ’s lordship. Do not demons even do the latter, according to James? The question is, what has Christ done in his death and resurrection to offer the grace of repentance to you, me and Donald Trump? Has a genuine life change occurred because he has been empowered by the Holy Spirit to come out of his sin and pursue Christlikeness in both his personal and political life? And what might such a conversion look like in the life of any person, in this case Donald Trump?
Of course, someone might challenge and say, “C’mon, man, give him a break. Dobson’s right, Trump’s just a baby Christian. He doesn’t know everything he needs to know. He can’t know all the gospel requires of him.”
Indeed. No Christian is perfect, especially young believers who are just wading into the love and holiness of God. But, again, I don’t think the problem is with Trump’s infancy or newness to the faith. The problem is a bland gospel that says, “Accept Christ as your personal Lord and Savior and you can go to heaven when you die.” The problem is with an understanding of the gospel that is limited to personal decision, preferences for heaven over hell and offers blessing without a cross, salvation without confession and repentance
But the gospel of Christ is much more robust than the privatized, personal gospel of my evangelical tradition, and this fact should be part of what Trump (and all other converts) is presented with. Doesn’t anyone else find it odd that Dobson is speaking of Trump’s new-found faith, but Trump, himself, has said nothing? Even if his conversion were genuine, this seems suspect, especially given the church’s call for public confession of faith throughout history. The early church used to have those who wished to convert wait an entire year before they were publicly baptized and declared to be Christians. While certainly the Bible offers examples of immediate baptism upon profession of faith, the early church recognized that the kind of life change required by the gospel meant that they had a responsibility to make sure that converts understood as clearly as possible what they were entering. During the year-long waiting period, the converts were taught Christian belief and were invited to follow (i.e. be discipled) the lifestyle of a mature believer.
I’m not saying we need to go back to a one-year waiting period, but such a tactic would solve the problem raised by James Dobson, that Trump speaks of vague religion but not the specifics of “faith and belief.” Indeed, such a discipleship period would help new Christians see precisely that Christianity offers no bland, oblong blur of a faith, but says something specific about the creator God and what that God has done in Christ for the reconciliation of the world. Maybe such a period wouldn’t solve all our problems, but it’d be a step in the right direction.
So why don’t we do something like this?
Our Protestant free-grace teachings have combined with our American pragmatism and a valuation of numbers, resulting in an understanding of conversion so easy that there is no cross to carry let alone lifestyle to change. We ask people to say they’re sorry for sin in general, but we don’t speak of the specific repentance the gospel calls forth, nor the life of holiness and sanctification Christ says is necessary to be his disciple. We talk about salvation as something we enter into so our soul can go to heaven, but little about the holines and sanctification of life that the gospel empowers in the here and now. Our gospel has been Americanized, privatized, commodified and politicized. And thus it is stilted, stale and sad.
Am I picking on Donald Trump here? No. Donald Trump is a microcosm of a larger problem. It is time we who claim to be followers of Jesus actually start living and proclaiming what Jesus actually said. Yes, of course, salvation is a free gift of God, offered by grace, received by faith. Of course no one is going to “get it” all immediately (or ever). But the same Bible that teaches that freeness and grace also says, “work out your salvation with fear and trembling.” It’s time to consider what that might mean, not just for Donald Trump, but for me and you, our communities and the world in which we live. After all, is it really possible for great God of creation and redemption to enter into a human soul or community without leaving a mark? I think not. I sincerely hope Trump’s conversion is legitimate. The fruits of repentance will tell. They will be lived out in his personal and political life. That’s what the gospel teaches us, anyway. It’s what it’s always taught us, whether we wanted to acknowledge it or not.


Saturday, June 25, 2016

Walking the Spiritual Path

This meditation comes from the small Episcopal daily devotional guide Forward Day by Day. As I read it this morning I decided that it should be posted here, especially considering the theme of this blog.

SATURDAY, June 25

Psalm 108:1-2 My heart is firmly fixed, O God, my heart is fixed; I will sing and make melody. Wake up, my spirit; awake, lute and harp; I myself will waken the dawn.

I experienced a spiritual awakening in my late twenties. I was listening to the words of a very wise spiritual teacher, words that still ring true and have stayed with me for over a decade. Walking the spiritual path, he said, is the unfolding of our attempts to be faithful to our awakened hearts. Although we do not always see down the road, we are granted insight in the next step. Something rings true, something resonates, and our awakened heart confirms and validates what it is we need to do, whether to undertake a daily spiritual practice, initiate a major life change, or simply burst out in a song of thanksgiving. 
The common ground we all share is love. Love awakens our hearts and leads us along the path, to the center of God’s heart, to the center of ourselves, and to a new and more profound engagement with the world.

(The bold emphasis is mine. The above meditation along with other scripture from the Revised Common Lectionary and comments by readers can be found at: http://prayer.forwardmovement.org/forward_day_by_day.php?d=25&m=6&y=2016

Saturday, March 26, 2016

Judas Go Quickly

On Wednesday March 23, 2016 the Gospel reading for the day was John13:21-32. In verse 27b, "Jesus said 'Judas, go quickly and do what you have to do' ... It was already night."

These last four words hit me and I am not sure exactly why. Is it because "night" has come when the decision by Judas (you / me) is made; even before the action is taken, the deed is done?

When we make decisions that we know are wrong, even evil, has night already fallen? Does the sun set on our intentions even before the action?

Suppose we change our mind and our direction and do not do what we had considered. Is it then daylight or does darkness still decent? Do intentions, even if not acted on, still set negative events in motion?

It is Wednesday in Holy Week and Judas has been sent on his way by Jesus. The one who is to suffer is instructing the perpetrator. Why was Judas chosen? It is said, in the Gospels, that Judas was the keeper of the common purse, and that he sometimes used the money for himself. Did these "small" sins of greed or self indulgence pave the way for the ultimate btrayel? When we contemplate doing something that may be less than appropriate do we say to ourselves, "This is really no big deal; it doesn't matter that much" are we paving our own road to making it, "... already night."?

Of course as Christians, we know that God brings good out of the actions of Judas; but it is important to remember the suffering that occurred before it was daylight again. In the book The Will of God by Leslie Weatherhead he says that God's will is always done because God will see to it. But he also says that for a time we can thwart that will, with our free will; but only for a time. Given this he speculates that with our cooperation God's will could be done more quickly. He even fanticises that if people had followed Jesus instead of crusifing him it would not have already been night.

But as Christians we know the outcome and we know that on Easter morning the Son will rise, and that we can celebrate that Rising every Sunday.

Saturday, March 5, 2016

Time Limits

One of the readings for today March 5, 2016 in the Common Revised Lectionary  as listed in the booklet Forward Day by Day is Psalm 90. At the ripe old age of 71 several verses from this Psalm strike me as important. They are verse 1, "Our Lord, in all generations you have been our home." Verses 5B and 6: "We are merely tender grass that sprouts and grows in the morning but dries up by evening." And verse 12: "Teach us to use wisely all the time we have." When these verses are strung together we can see the good advice contained in them.

In another book, Meeting Jesus on the Margins, in the section designated for this date, the author of this meditation departs from Matthew 25 (the basis for the book) and quotes Mark 10:46-52 where Jesus and His disciples meet the blind Bartimaeus. As the Gospel tells us, Bartimaeus is persistant until he gets Jesus' attention and asks to be healed of his blindness. Jesus grants his request and restores Bartimaeus' sight, "because of your faith." The Gospel further reports that, "... he (Bartimaeus) went down the road with Jesus." (v.52b) 

As Followers of the Way our sight has been restored by Jesus and, like Bartimseus, we "go... down the road with Jesus..." We should also understand that in the evening we will dry up and blow away; at least in an Earthly sense, and that our walk down the road following Jesus is limited in time. What we do with that time, that time that is limited no matter our age, is of upmost importance for the sight that we have been given needs to be shared as we tread the path that follows Jesus.

(Scripture quoted from the Contemporary English Version.) 

Saturday, January 9, 2016

I wonder

I wonder as I wander out under the sky
How Jesus the Saviour did come for to die
For poor on'ry people like you and like I;
I wonder as I wander out under the sky. *

Many of the very earliest 1st Century Christians were converts from the Jewish faith. They probably could be thought of as Jewish-Christians. Because their early understanding (pre-christian understanding) of how God forgave sins was through animal scarifies it seems logical that this sacrificial concept would have followed them into their "new religion" as Christians. Therefor Paul, originally a Jew, could/ did say, as he did in Colossians1:20a:

And God was pleased
      for him to make peace
by sacrificing his blood
     on the cross.
(The above emphasis is mine.)

There are those today especially among the Emerging Generations, I have read, who find it difficult to accept the idea that a loving God, the heavenly father of Jesus, would sacrifice his Son as the only way to forgive us our sins.

I think that we have a clash of concept, understanding and culture here. The 1st Christian-Jews saw blood sacrifice as a way for sins to be forgiven. But today people see that as barbaric and primitive. Is it possible that that the earliest Christian-Jews were so shocked byJesus' death that to make it understandable and acceptable that they had to see this death as blood sacrifice to be a forgiveness of sins? Is it possible (and I'm thinking of Leslie Weatherhead's The Will of God) that people at that time could have accepted Jesus' teachings and His death would not have been necessary? After all, God being God could simply forgive us our sins if we are willing to accept that forgiveness and follow through.

If this is even a possibility, and the crucifixion of Jesus was a result of the actions of people could God therefor be viewed, more accurately, as a loving and not as a fratricidal, blood thirsty deity?  And would this understanding fit better into our postmodern sensibilities and be more accepted by the Emerging Generations?

But whatever our speculations Jesus did die on the Cross and he did die to forgive us our sins. With the concept of people, not God, determining the method of Jesus' death the onus is placed on people not God. This allows for the correct concept of God being a loving and not a vengeful, blood thirsty  deity. God's love is further demonstrated by Jesus being raised to new life. That new life is promised to us after our Earthly life. But there is also new life for us while we walk about this Earth. New life not only as Life After Life (to steal the title of another book) but new life as we attempt to emulate the life of Jesus and His teachings, such as those found in Matthew 25.

Our world view reflects and determines how we understand events. Jesus' teachings can alter our world view.


* Lyrics from: "I Wonder as I Wander" found at

http://www.oldielyrics.com/christmas/i_wonder_as_i_wander.html

Friday, January 1, 2016

Non Sequitur Comic Strip, December 20, 2015 on GoComics.com

Go to:
Non Sequitur Comic Strip, December 20, 2015 on GoComics.com
http://www.gocomics.com/nonsequitur/2015/12/20


Is this how we treat strangers?

All Of It Is Under Our Power

In the Episcopal church today is remembered as, "The Holy Name of Our Lord Jesus Christ" and the scriptures designated for today in the Revised Common Lectionary follow that theme. Even Psalm 8 echoes the theme when it says in verse 1a "Our Lord and Ruler, your name is wonderful everywhere on earth!" * and repeats it again in verse 9. (The psalmist was, of course, referring to God and not Jesus; but the concept is there.) Reading further in the Psalm, however, I was struck by another message buried there. Verses 6 through 8 say:
            "You let us rule everything
                 your hands have made.
             And you put all of it
                  under our power -
             the sheep and the cattle,
                   and every wild animal,
             the birds in the sky,
             the fish in the sea,
                   and all ocean creatures.

As we look to a new year on this first day of January perhaps this is one of the lessons we most need to carry into this new year because we continue to hear the warnings about Climate Change. The challenge presented by Climate Change seems overwelming and an understandable knee jerk reaction is, "What can I do about such a huge problem?" Realistically as an individual we can do little. But as individuals working together in small ways we can have an impact by consciously recycling and engaging in other common sense actions. (Do we really need to use that paper plate this time or can we take the time to wash the dish? How many paper napkins do we really need when we eat at the fast food restaurant? Is this the type of plastic that will recycle; should I take the time to find out?) Many small actions can add up to making an impact and we should do this because, "... you put all of it under our power."

* Contemporary English Version